Since high school, I’ve had a draw to college textbooks of many kinds, especially in the sciences. Even though a given subject is of interest, the truth is, I’ve never felt confident to finish a text front to back.
Perhaps the main reason for such is the fact that without any instructor, you can’t guarantee your getting the right information. Even if you can comprehend the writing with no problem, textbook material needs that actual power imparted by the professor in order to know exactly what is going on. This is especially true when you consider a college’s prerequisites for a given subject. Reading such a book (and usually, thus taking such a class) warrants previous knowledge.
Moreover, especially in the natural sciences, you need labs, field trips, and many other practical exercises to truly learn concepts. And of course, the lecture is at the center of it all.
Also, the fact that textbooks are constantly updated means inevitably that, as you grow older, you will miss newer material taught long after you graduated. But again, you should be content with the position you are in now.
Now if you are out of college and wish to use a textbook for additional learning (e.g., when your school didn’t offer a given class), I don’t see anything wrong with that. But I’ll have to cross that bridge when I get there, as I would have to test that statement.
So I must resist spending money on texts that have nothing to do with my coursework, and just take “baby steps” toward the goals I may aspire to achieve. And I’ll leave the choices of texts to the professors. And ultimately, all of it is in God’s hands.
So until then, just Google things, or if you dare, use Wikipedia. LOL
One thought on “Why Textbooks Don’t Cut It On Their Own”
Very thoughtful Frank. I agree